| |
|
Rotch
News
Download the PDF version. Get
the free Acrobat Reader.
Our Complete Constructions
Reproduced
with permission from the January/February 2005 ArchitectureBoston
by Tamara Roy AIA
This year's Rotch competitors faced challenges at every
turn: a Korean religious center with a program that featured three assembly
spaces, including a children's chapel; a tight, sloping site with an existing
church; a total lack of information regarding another cultural tradition;
and 10 days to design and present their projects. Most of us would have
given up right there.
With $35,000 for a year of travel to gain, they persevered.
Aaron Follett, the winner (thus earning the title "2004 Rotch Scholar"),
condensed his building on the urban side of the site, stacking three compact
stories behind a teak screen. Layering functional elements like a wedding
cake, he organized the assembly spaces one per floor, moving up the building
from secular to religious spaces, with community outreach activities on
the ground, a classroom above, and a children's chapel on the top. He
left the rest of the site untouched, and gained the jury's respect for
the clearest of diagrams. His milky interior perspectives make one want
to know how, with more time, he might materially create the feeling of
being encased in translucent blue and peach jelly(!).
Elizabeth Kostojohn, the second-prize winner, and Jason
Knutson, the alternate, also developed compelling projects, hers a dispersion
of objects paying homage to the church and sheltering play areas and a
garden, his a whirlwind of movement whose vortex was the children's chapel
perched like a water tower over the church.
Yet, for all their skillful manipulation of space, form,
and structure, the projects seemed to avoid the real questions that this
project poses.What is spirituality to the Korean church-goers? How do
they feel about their existing church and its image in the neighborhood?
In a Korean family structure, how would parents hope to communicate "God"
to their children? How do architects make sacred space for young people?
Although the competitors were each allowed 100 words to describe their
project, the words "God," "spirit," "sacred,"
"religious," "Korean," and "family" were
noticeably absent.
Have the bible-thumpers stolen our vocabulary for life's
(or architecture's) big questions? Or do we now believe that architecture
should remain detached, abstract, and nonspecific? Perhaps it is also
the perceived rules of architectural competitions that make it unlikely
the designers would address the problematic intersections between culture
and building.We, as designers, are taught to show what we know, not to
reveal where we have questions or, worse, that we might lack answers.
Instead, we fill in the empty spaces with our own "stuff" before
we notice that the blanks aren't ours to fill – we are the messengers,
not the message.
Not surprisingly, those blanks become minimalistic visions,
even in the face of mounting evidence
that laypeople do not share the same love of empty space that we architects
are taught to
prize. The best spiritual buildings may be uncluttered, but they are anything
but empty: think of
Tadao Ando's Chapel on the Water, with its gritty concrete walls and huge
pool of water reflecting
a single cross, or Faye Jones' nearly breathing wood skeletal chapel in
the forest. Nature is a vital
element. Spiritual space is emotional space, and it is full.
Spiritual meaning, cultural identity, and humility are
difficult topics in our profession, yet they
are also some of the most important lessons these Rotch Scholars may learn
from their travels.
They are just at the beginning of their journeys to one of the greatest
cultural and spiritual spaces
there is – the world – and as they experience the diversity
of other countries, belief systems, and
buildings, they may get more comfortable with knowing less, asking questions,
and realizing how
incomplete our mental and physical constructions really are.
- Tamara Roy AIA practices architecture and urban design
at Von Grossmann & Company, teaches design at Northeastern University,
and is a previous $15,000 second-prize winner of the Rotch Travelling
Scholarship. This year's competition program was written by Brian Healy
AIA.
The Rotch Travelling Scholarship was established in 1883
to advance architectural education through foreign study and travel. Rotch
Scholars today are selected through an annual two-stage competition. For
more information, go to www.rotchscholarship.org.
To learn more about the
Rotch competition, eligibility, and deadlines, please contact Kate Miller
kmiller@architects.org at
(617) 951-1433 x234.
|